Shariah protects falsehood and punishes the Truth

In the Name of Allah the Most Merciful the Most Beneficent

Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon the Prophet and his noble family.

That kind of Shariah in the time of Hazrest Isa bin Maryam, that declared Hazret Isa to be a heretic and infidel, and orders the capital punishment on Hazret Isa, had arrived in Islam after the death of prophet Muhammad (a.s).

The Shariah, that authorized Yazeed bin Muawiya into authority and leadership.

The Shariah that started Islamic civil war in the time of Hazret Imam Ali (a.s) contrary to the order of Allah, in Quran 3:103 And hold fast, all together, by the rope which Allah (stretches out for you), and be not divided among yourselves; 

The Shariah that persecuted Ahlul Bayt (family of the Prophet) although the Messenger of Allah commanded love and allegiance to Ahlul Bayt.

Sahih Muslim 2408a

Yazid b. Hayyan reported, I went along with Husain b. Sabra and ‘Umar b. Muslim to Zaid b. Arqam and, as we sat by his side, Husain said to him:

Zaid. you have been able to acquire a great virtue that you saw Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) listened to his talk, fought by his side in (different) battles, offered prayer behind me. Zaid, you have in fact earned a great virtue. Zaid, narrate to us what you heard from Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ). He said: I have grown old and have almost spent my age and I have forgotten some of the things which I remembered in connection with Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ), so accept whatever I narrate to you, and which I do not narrate do not compel me to do that. He then said: One day Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) stood up to deliver sermon at a watering place known as Khumm situated between Mecca and Medina. He praised Allah, extolled Him and delivered the sermon and. exhorted (us) and said: Now to our purpose. O people, I am a human being. I am about to receive a messenger (the angel of death) from my Lord and I, in response to Allah’s call, (would bid good-bye to you), but I am leaving among you two weighty things: the one being the Book of Allah in which there is right guidance and light, so hold fast to the Book of Allah and adhere to it. He exhorted (us) (to hold fast) to the Book of Allah and then said: The second are the members of my household I remind you (of your duties) to the members of my family. He (Husain) said to Zaid: Who are the members of his household? Aren’t his wives the members of his family? Thereupon he said: His wives are the members of his family (but here) the members of his family are those for whom acceptance of Zakat is forbidden. And he said: Who are they? Thereupon he said: ‘Ali and the offspring of ‘Ali, ‘Aqil and the offspring of ‘Aqil and the offspring of Ja’far and the offspring of ‘Abbas. Husain said: These are those for whom the acceptance of Zakat is forbidden. Zaid said: Yes.

Jami Tirmidi 3786 (sahih) Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah”I saw the Messenger of Allah during his Hajj, on the Day of ‘Arafah. He was upon his camel Al-Qaswa, giving a Khutbah, so he said: ‘O people! Indeed, I have left among you, that which if you hold fast to it, you shall not go astray: The Book of Allah and my family, the people of my house.'”

What does these hadith means, in simple language?. It means, if you do not hold fast to the book of Allah and the family of Nabi (a.s), you would be misguided!, another Hadiths it says that hold fast with your molar teeth, and beware of innovation.

In fact, the innovation that happened in the Muslim world is the Muslims cut off their adherance to the Book of Allah and Ahlul Bayt.

Sunan Abu Dawood 4607

Narrated Irbad ibn Sariyah:

AbdurRahman ibn Amr as-Sulami and Hujr ibn Hujr said: We came to Irbad ibn Sariyah who was among those about whom the following verse was revealed: “Nor (is there blame) on those who come to thee to be provided with mounts, and when thou saidst: “I can find no mounts for you.”

We greeted him and said: We have come to see you to give healing and obtain benefit from you.

Al-Irbad said: One day the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) led us in prayer, then faced us and gave us a lengthy exhortation at which the eyes shed tears and the hearts were afraid.

A man said: Messenger of Allah! It seems as if it were a farewell exhortation, so what injunction do you give us?

He then said: I enjoin you to fear Allah, and to hear and obey even if it be an Abyssinian slave, for those of you who live after me will see great disagreement. You must then follow my sunnah and that of the rightly-guided caliphs. Hold to it and stick fast to it. Avoid novelties, for every novelty is an innovation, and every innovation is an error. (sahih) END

To curse/revile Hazret Ali (a.s) and Ahlul Bayt do not come from rightly guided persons. The Quran orders the rise of a group who command good and forbid evil. But the Sunni world has been messed up and corrupted by those who command to do evil to Ahlul Bayt and to the Muslims in general description!

The Commands of Allah has been forgotten by the same people who were the scribes of Quran:

Quran 3:104 Let there be a group among you who call ˹others˺ to goodness, encourage what is good, and forbid what is evil—it is they who will be successful.

Is reviling and cursing Hazret Ali (A.S) and Ahlul Bayt a good command or instruction/Sunnah of successors?

Sahih Bukhari 48 Narrated ‘Abdullah: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, “Abusing a Muslim is Fusuq (an evil doing) and killing him is Kufr (disbelief).”

Jami at-Tirmidhi 3736 (sahih) Narrated ‘Ali: “The Prophet (ﷺ) – the Unlettered Prophet – exhorted me (saying): ‘None loves you except a believer and none hates you except a hypocrite.’” ‘Adi bin Thabit (a narrator) said: “I am from the generation whom the Prophet (ﷺ) supplicated for.”

Sunan An-Nisaih 5039 (sahih) It was narrated from Anas bin Malik that: The Prophet [SAW] said: “None of you has believed until he loves for his brother what he loves for himself.”

Sahih Muslim 2409 Sahl b. Sa`d reported that a person from the offspring of Marwan was appointed as the governor of Medina. He called Sahl b. Sa`d and ordered him to abuse `Ali. Sahl refused to do that. He (the governor) said to him:

If you do not agree to it (at least) say: May Allah curse Abu Turab. Sahl said: There was no name dearer to `Ali than Abu Turab (for it was given to him by the Prophet himself) and he felt delighted when he was called by this name. He (the governor) said to him: Narrate to us the story of his being named as Abu Turab. He said: Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) came to the house of Fatima and he did not find `Ali in the house; whereupon he said: Where is your uncle’s son? She said: (There cropped up something) between me and him which had annoyed him with me. He went out and did not rest here. Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) asked a person to find out where he was. He came and said: Allah’s Messenger, he is sleeping in the mosque. Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) came to him and found him lying in the mosque and saw that his mantle had slipped from his back and his back was covered with dust and Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) began to wipe it away from him (from the body of Hadrat `Ali) saying: Get up, covered with dust (Abu Turab); get up, covered with dust.

Jami Tirmidhi 3724 (Sahih)

Narrated ‘Amir bin Sa’d bin Abi Waqqas:

from his father, saying “Mu’awiyah bin Abu Sufyan ordered Sa’d, saying ‘What prevented you from reviling Abu Turab?’ He said: ‘Three things that I remember from the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) prevent me from reviling him. That I should have even one those things is more beloved to me than red camels. I heard the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) speaking to ‘Ali, and he had left him behind in one of his battles. So ‘Ali said to him: “O Messenger of Allah! You leave me behind with women and children?” So the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said to him: “Are you not pleased that you should be in the position with me that Harun was with Musa? Except that there is no Prophethood after me?” And on the Day of (the battle of) Khaibar, I heard him saying: “I shall give the banner to a man who loves Allah and His Messenger, and Allah and His Messenger love him.” So we all waited for that, then he said: “Call ‘Ali for me.” He said: ‘So he came to him, and he had been suffering from Ramad (an eye condition), so he (ﷺ) put spittle in his eye and gave the banner to him, then Allah granted him victory. And when this Ayah was revealed: ‘Let us call our sons and your sons, our women and your women…’ (3:61) the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) called ‘Ali, Fatimah, Hasan, and Husain and said: “O Allah, these are my family.” END

END OF QUOTE

We don’t expect to this generation to give any better love and respect to Ahlul Bayt, although there are talks and crocodile tears goes around about love of Nabi Muhammad (a.s) Ahlul Bayt. Most of their spiritual lineage and charecteristics and desires comes from those who used to persecute and insult ahlul bayt!. The Mind says: O yeah, we are Sunni, we have to balanace between Ahlul Bayt and others.

You follow your own thoughts and ideas, not the Quran and Sunnah!

Latter days, persecution of Awliya Allah continued by those who follow Shariah on the basis of intellect rather than on the basis of spirituality. But the same clowns who pesecuiute Awliya Allah, refuse to give a statement on some of the companions hatred towards Hazret Ali and Ahlul Bayt, although they have the Book, the Law and the sunnah.

Imam Malik (R.A) says: Imam Malik (r) said, “Whoever studies jurisprudence (fiqh) and didn’t study Sufism (tasawwuf) will be corrupted; and whoever studied tasawwuf and didn’t study jurisprudence will become a heretic; and whoever combined both will be reach the Truth.” This saying is mentioned and explained in the book of the scholar ‘Ali al-Adawi with the explanation of Imam Abil-Hassan, a scholar of jurisprudence, vol. 2, p. 195. (Quoted by Hisham Kabbani in his book the Naqshbandi Way History of the Saints of Golden Chain/topics/testimony of the scholars of external knowledge)

The Law of Islam according to the scholars fails to judge correctly, because they don’t judge based on spiritual insight, but based on intellectual facts and external evidences.

Intellectual Shariah law protects falsehood and murders the truth:

When the intellectual Shariah Law keepers orders the murder of hazret Isa (a.s) or Jesus Christ, Hazret Hallaj Mansoor, Hazret ibn Arabi and others, who are possesed by the Spirit of God (Roohul Qudus), although the Hadith says so (Imam Nawawi 40 Hadiths No 38), intellectual shariah shelters and merciful towards someone who is possessed by a demon, a devil or a false spirit. Intellectual Shariah pardons a murderer with blood money, intellectual shariah set free a criminal if there are no sufficient witnesses. Intellectual Shariah law shelters a dhimmi although he had murdered 100s of Muslims in the past. There are many more examples, but this is sufficient beginning to educate the 21st century square-head crminal minded Islamic scholars and sufi leaders.

The creed of external Law (Shariah) fears the Sainthood and truth. It seeks to devour enmity to the Saints. And Allah declared war on those who oppose His Awliya (38/40 Hadith Nawawi)

Look at what happened now, the creed of Shariah lost their influence and authority, whole world become secular. All oppressors of the Awliya Allah and Ahlul Bayt, they desert the Law now. The law changes and take new shapes through its tongues (the scholars). However, the same Message of the Saints still prevailing and spreading around the world, althouh people are not perfect in following them. People are ashamed to preach the law, even the people of the Law dress up like mystics and label themselves as the followers of early mystics, and trying to use mysticism as a make-up, and preaching universal love.

We are assigned to teach and remind scholars and leaders, rulers and priests. But they are as Sufi Shaykhs or scholars, are only assigned to teach or lead their ignorant community memebers, cult members, or groups. True spiritual leadership have authority over all humanity. Because true spiritual leadership manifest not on one’s own will, but by the will of God and supports of Roohul Qudus, and Noble Messengers of Allah.

Indeed, Shariah law and its custodians failed to protect people of Haqq (Awliya Allah), our words will be superior till the day of judgement. You cannot prevail over our wisdom, because you are falsehood.

Peace be upon the Prophets of Allah

Praise be to Allah, the LORD of all

Hadiths challenge Maturidi and Salafi Tawhid

In the Name of Allah the Most Merciful the Most Beneficent

Peace and blessings of Allah be upon the Prophet and his noble family.

Topic: Salafi and Maturidi Tawhid is crippled!

Sahaba (companions of the Prophet) held a statement which says: Allah and His Messenger knows (best).

Hadith translations held a statement: “Allah and His Messenger knows best”.

Both indicates Prophet Muhammad (a.s) as having co-equal knowledge in the knowledge of Allah.

Maturidi Theological dilemma in the Quran, Mishkat , and Sahih Al Bukhari.

The Post from Clarifying Light:
The holy Prophet ﷺ came out of his house 𝐛𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐰𝐨 𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬. He ﷺ said: “Do you know what these books are?” The Ṣaḥāba said: “No, O Allāh’s Messenger. Please tell us about these books.” The holy Prophet ﷺ pointed at the book in his right hand and said: “This is the Book from Almighty Allāh. It contains the names of the inmates of Paradise and their father’s names and the names of their clans. The total number of the inmates of Paradise is given at the end of this book.”

Then the noble Prophet ﷺ pointed at the other book in his left hand and said: “This is a Book from Allāh, the Creator of the worlds. It contains the names of the inmates of Hell and their father’s names and the names of their tribes. The total number of inmates of the Hell is given at the end of the text. This number will never change, neither addition nor deletion.”

► Mishkāt al-Maṣābīḥ, Vol. 1, Pg. 61, Graded Ṣaḥīḥ

► Jāmiʾ at-Tirmidhī, Ḥadīth 2141

This Narration is also available in many Ḥadīth books such as:

► Musnad Aḥmad

► Muʾjam al-Ṭabarānī

Points which can be derived from the Ḥadīth:

1. The Prophet ﷺ was informed by Allāh of the destiny of all the people from the time of Nabī Ādam (ʿalayhis-salām) until Qiyāmah.

2. The Prophet ﷺ knew how many will enter Jannah and how many will enter Jahannam.

3. The Prophet ﷺ knew the names of the people of the past, present and future and recognises their fathers as well.

4. The Prophet ﷺ knew even the clan and the tribe of a person of past, present and future and which they belonged to.

5. Every clan or tribe from the time of Sayyidunā Ādam (ʿalayhis-salām) until Qiyāmah is known to the Prophet ﷺ.

6. The Beloved Prophet ﷺ knew the state of īmān (faith) of every person at his/her last breath.

7. The Beloved Prophet ﷺ knew the final abode of every single person.

8. Thus, the Prophet ﷺ also knew the Muslims who will be punished for sometime before entering their final abode (Jannah).

9. Thus, the Beloved Prophet ﷺ also knew those Muslims who will be receiving his Shafāʿat (intercession) after the punishment.

10. Neither Jannah and its inmates nor Jahannam and its inmates are hidden from the blessed sight and knowledge of the the Beloved Prophet ﷺ bestowed to him by Allāh.

11. This shows us the glimpse of the blessed ʿIlm al-Ghayb (Knowledge of the Unseen) that Allāh bestowed to the Beloved Prophet ﷺ.

OUR REVIEW:

The Quran says, Nabi a.s wasn’t even informed of the names of all the Prophets.

Quran 4:164 There are messengers whose stories We have told you already and others We have not. And to Moses Allah spoke directly.

Quran 40:78 MUHSIN KHAN
And, indeed We have sent Messengers before you (O Muhammad SAW); of some of them We have related to you their story and of some We have not related to you.

In Hadiths
Sahih al-Bukhari 6586
Narrated Ibn Al-Musaiyab:
The companions of the Prophet (ﷺ) said, “Some men from my companions will come to my Lake-Fount and they will be driven away from it, and I will say, ‘O Lord, my companions!’ It will be said, ‘You have no knowledge of what they innovated after you left: they turned apostate as renegades (reverted from Islam).

Innaka la ilma laka” is plainly used in the hadith. Therefore it is heresy to claim that the Prophet knew everything.

Another Problem for the Maturidi and Salafi creed is the statement in hadith and its wrong translation.

Jami` at-Tirmidhi 2643
Narrated Mu’adh bin Jabal:
that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: “Do you know what Allah’s right upon His slaves is?” I said: “Allah and His Messenger know best.” He said: “His right upon them is that they worship Him alone and do not associate any partners with Him.” He said: “And do you know what their right over Allah is if they do that?” I said: “Allah and His Messenger know best.” He said: “That He will not punish them.”

“Allahu wa rasooluhu a’alam” translated as “Allah and His Messenger knows best” in numerous Hadiths contradict theology of Islam, by making the Messenger equally partner in the knowledge of Allah.

Quran 46:9 Say: I am not the first of the messengers, and I do not know what will be done with me or with you: I do not follow anything but that which is revealed to me, and I am nothing but a plain warner.

So saying, Allah and His Messenger knows best or knows, goes clearly against the principles of the Quran and other Hadiths. For example
Sahih al-Bukhari 1039 Narrated Ibn `Umar: Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) (p.b.u.h) said, “Keys of the unseen knowledge are five which nobody knows but Allah . . . nobody knows what will happen tomorrow; nobody knows what is in the womb; nobody knows what he will gain tomorrow; nobody knows at what place he will die; and nobody knows when it will rain.”

Sunan Ibn Majah 1897 It was narrated that Abu Husain, whose name was Khalid Al-Madani, said:
“We were in Al-Madinah on the Say of ‘Ashura and the girls were beating the Daff and singing. We entered upon Rubai’ bint Mu’awwidh and mentioned that to her. She said: ‘The Messenger of Allah entered upon me on the morning of my wedding, and there were two girls with me who were singing and mentioning the qualities of my forefathers who were killed on the Day of Badr. One of the things they were saying was: “Among us there is a Prophet who knows what will happen tomorrow.” He said: “Do not say this, for no one knows what will happen tomorrow except Allah.”
(sahih)

I hope our salafi kids will enjoy this tawhid syrup with clotted shirk cream. I wonder how come salafis could accept all these hadiths and translations which says: Allah and His Messenger knows best”, and why did sahaba made Prophet equal with Allah in the knowledge and understanding? .

It’s time to close down salafi tawhid centres along with all these six sahih hadith books and miskat. Aa they are proved to be the books of shirk as per the standard salafi narratives.
Let’s return to Judaism , dear salafi kids…proper tawhid is found therein!

For Maturidi , sunni kids, summon your demons from New York, Turkey, Pakistan, Bangladesh, India and Cyprus tomorrow to make fatwa against author of Mishkat , author of sahih Bukhari, it’s narrators who narrated those Hadiths, ultimately you may give fatwa against Allah and His Messenger as there are going to be serious issues with beliefs related to this topic. You love making fatwa against every holy ones, like Yahudis, who gave some verdict against (e.g Qurran 5:64) Allah and His Messengers.

Quran 5:64 ˹Some among˺ the Jews said, “Allah is tight-fisted.”

So if you have a problem with Hazret Ibn Arabi (q.s) and other great Sufis (awliya Allah), you are definitely going to have a problem with Allah and His Messenger (a.s), which ultimately prove you are not true believers as Sufis or as Maturidis. And your arguement with salafis and others is just another sectarian nonsense.

Peace and blessings be upon the servants of truth. Aameen

Shaykhs will return before the Day of Judgement: Lokman Effendi contradicts Sunni Theology

Lokman Effendi claims that Shayks will return at the time of Imam Mahdi (a.s)

In the name of Allah, the Most Merciful the Most Beneficent

In various discourses, Lokman Effendi claimed that Shaykh Abdul Kerim Al-Kibrisi (q.s) and Shaykh Nazim Al-Haqqani (q.s) will return at the time of Imam Mahdi (a.s).

I would like to ask the so-called Maturidi following Lokman Hoja, Is this a Maturidi belief?

I would like to ask Sunni Imams of England, do you endorse this belief in Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jamah?

If yes, don’t read any further.

If your answer is “no”, then will you summon this Demon from (the one who does black magic and honey trap works with the demons, Shaykh Abdul Kerim Al-Kibrisi says you are what you eat/consume) America to desert his statements?

Lukku Ji proclaims his shaykh will return, sending a shock to Sunni imams, and to his sheep and goats from Maturidi Pakistani-Indian-BD background.

We find the concept of rapture in the New Testament written in the letters of Apostle Paul.

1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord forever.

I would like to ask Maturidis and other Sunni dressed clowns. Why would we remain as a seperate religion from Christianity?. We could be assimilated as a sect in Christianity or a branch in Catholicism, such as Benedictine, Dominicans, Vincentians, and lastly Muhammadans.

Shaykh Nazim asks Pope: “I am weak, Pray for me”

If Shaykh Nazim Al-Haqqani (q.s) who is considered the Sultan of all Saints, could ask prayer from Catholic Pope, the Sultan of Christians, if Lokman could preach the theology of Apostle Paul, if Hazret Abu Ali Al Farmadi (q.s) could say, all attributs of Allah can become the attribute of His Servant, why would we deny the Christian faith?.

I would like to ask all Maturidis and Sufi tariqah following theology kids from the Islamic institutions.

I would like to ask these Sunnis and Sufis, what’s the integrity of your Islamic faith?, integrity of Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jamah?, integrity of your own individuals masquarading as Awliya and Scholars?

Shaykh Nazim declares to be no more Sufi, but Rabbani, Rabbani is another title of Christ in the New Testament. The title “Rabbani” is mentioned in the Quran 3:79. We can see throughout the New Testament that the apostles and disciples of Jesus Christ (a.s) identifying themselves as “Name…the servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ”. (Matthew 7:21, James 1:1, Romans 1:1, Philippains 1:1, 1 Thesalonians 1:1, 2Thessalonians 1:1, 2Peter 1:1, Jude 1:1,

John 20:16 Jesus saith unto her, Mary. She turned herself, and saith unto him, Rabboni; which is to say, Master.

In fact, Shaykh Nazim Al-Haqqani (q.s) declares himself to be Masihi (follower of the Messiah) and denies his former attributes (Sufi/Sunni/Naqshbandi/Mauturidi etc). This does not mean Shaykh became a Christian. Rather it means, all schools and religions are irrelevant for those who become a disciple of Hadarath Isa (a.s).

How do you feel about all these mysteries my dear Sufi/Sunni/Maturidi kids?

We have so many things to say, but your mind is too small, you cannot bear them now.

Wa salamun alal mursaleen

Walhamdulillahi Rabbil Alameen

Imam Hussain (a.s) wasn’t martyred: Shaykh Nazim challenges Sunni-Shia beliefs.

In the Name of Allah the Most Merciful the Most Beneficent

Peace and blessings of Allah be upon the Prophet, his family, and companions.

In a shocking blow to Sunni (Maturidi, Salafi, Ashari, Deobandi, Barelvi) beliefs, and Shia’ism, Our beloved grand Shayakh, Mawlana Shaykh Nazim Al-Haqqani (q.s) gave a powerful disocurse about Hazret Imam Mahdi (a.s) and Hazret Imam Hussain (a.s). In which, Mawlana Shaykh Nazim Al-Haqqani (q.s) pointed out that Imam Hussain (a.s) wasnt’ martyred in Karabala, comparing the Sunni belief in the martyrdom of Imam Hussain (a.s) with the Christian belief in the crucifixion of Jesus Christ (a.s).

According to Mawlana Shaykh Nazim Al-Haqqani (q.s), Muslim belief about the martyrdom of Imam Hussain at Karbala is same as the Christian belief of the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ, both did not happen for certain!

Mawlana Shaykh Nazim then quotes the verses from the Quran chapter 4:158 and claims Imam Hussain (a.s) was taken upto heavens, to the presence of his grandfather, Prophet Muhammad (a.s).

Imam Hussain wasn’t martyred, He was ascended to heaven, Shaykh Nazim from 17.00 min onwards

In fact, Mawlana Shaykh Nazim (q.s) claimed that majority Sunni Muslims and Shia are following/imitating the Christians by claiming Imam Hussain was martyred.

Quran 4:157-158 And [for] their saying, “Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah .” And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain. Rather, Allah raised him to Himself. And ever is Allah Exalted in Might and Wise.

Are the Sunni ulema and Shia imitating the Christians by believing and commemorating the martyrdom of Imam Hussain?

Sahih Muslim 2669a Abu Sa’id al-Khudri reported Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) as saying:

You would tread the same path as was trodden by those before you inch by inch and step by step so much so that if they had entered into the hole of the lizard, you would follow them in this also. We said: Allah’s Messenger, do you mean Jews and Christians (by your words)” those before you”? He said: Who else (than those two religious groups)?

If Shaykh Nazim’s words are true about Imam Hussain (a.s), then every follower of Shaykh Nazim (q.s) would have to agree that sunni Islam is corrupted, like Judaism and Christianity got corrupted, as the Quran and Hadith tells. In such scenario, no real followers of Shaykh Nazim Al-Haqqani (q.s) have to go to Sunni Ulema and conform to their beliefs, terms and condition, either about Ibn Arabi (q.s) or about Imam Hussain (a.s).

Also, we can understand that the pacts and treaties of British Sunni Imams with Lokman Hoja is in vain, if they know that Shaykh Nazim taught Imam Hussain wasn’t martyred.

Shaykh Nazim’s statment denying the martyrdom of Imam Hussain even goes against authentic prophetic traditions? Dr Tahirul Qadri even speaks

https://muslimmatters.org/2013/11/13/prophet-know-grandson-al-hussain-going-martyred/

The Narration of Umm Salamah, the Wife of the Prophet 

حدثنا وكيع قال حدثني عبد الله بن سعيد عن أبيه عن عائشة أو أم سلمة. قال وكيع: شك عبد الله بن سعيد. أن النبي قال لإحداهما: لقد دخل علي البيت ملك لم يدخل علي قبلها فقال لي: إن ابنك هذا حسين مقتول، وإن شئت أريتك من تربة الأرض التي يقتل بها. قال: فأخرج تربة حمراء. مسند الإمام أحمد ٢٩٤/٦

Narrated Wakee’, narrated Abdullah bin Sa’eed, from his father from Aisha or Umm Salamah [Wakee’ said this doubt came from Abdullah bin Sa’eed] that the Prophet ṣallallāhu 'alayhi wa sallam (peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him) said to one of them [either Aisha or Umm Salamah raḍyAllāhu 'anhum (may Allāh be pleased with them)], “An angel entered the house on me, he never entered on me before, and he said to me, ‘this son of yours, al-Hussain, will be killed, and if you wish I can show you the soil from the earth where he will be killed’. Then he took out some red soil”. [Recorded in Musnad al-Imam Ahmad, vol. 6 p. 294]

So it is like, if Jesus Christ (a.s) was crucified and died, then Imam Hussain (a.s) was martyred. If jesus wasn’t crucified and died, but someone else took their place and a subsctitute was crucfied and killed in Jerusalem and a substitute was martyred in Karbala.

The Christian scriptures proclaim, Jesus was truly crucfiied and killed/

The Islamic scriptures and scholars proclaim Imam Hussain was martyred.

Islamic texts denies crufixion and death of Jesus Christ (a.s) by the spiritual wisdom of Prophet Muhammad (a.s)

Mawlana Shaykh Nazim (q.s) denies the martyrdom of Imam Hussain (a.s), based on his spiritual wisdom (Ilham).

Christians challenging Musliims based on the evidences they have about the crucifixion of Christ.

Would Muslims challenge Shaykh Nazim (q.s) by the texts of Islam and teachings early scholars about the martyrdom of Imam Hussain (a.s).

As the Alimighty reveals truth and inspire us with irrefutable questions to frauds like Lokman Effendi and U.K Sunni Imams, it expose the falsehood of these so called 21st century sunni Islam and Islam of Sufis like Lokman Hoja and others,

I would like to know what would be the fatwa (verdict) on the so called Sunni-Maturidi scholars of England and around the world, against Shaykh Nazim Al-Haqqani (q.s) for making such an insidious claim!

False Naqshbandis who want to align with the external scholars for the pleasures of this world removed this video discourse of Shaykh Nazim (q.s).

We have posted this dicourse earlier in October 19. 2015, available to read here:

Article from 2015 Imam Hussain wasn’t martyred, Shaykh Nazim (q.s) 16 February 2011, Lefke,Cyprus.

So now, we ask Lokman Effendi, who claimed to be the so called “Waris” (inheritor) of Shaykh Abdul Kerim Al-Kibirisi (q.s), would you agree with the teachings of Shaykh Nazim about Imam Hussain (a.s), or will you be booking London flight from New York, to come lick the boots of external scholars, and deny the teachings of your Shaykh?

I would like to ask Sunni scholars, why is the foundation (beliefs and theology) of your Sunni-sufi Islam is so weak?. Why is that now you both external Sufis and self-proclaimed Sufi idiots finding yourselves in the interrogation box set up by Jouhar Ali Naqshabandi Al-Hassani?. The version of Islam you follows seems to be falsehood, weak and frustrated about the truth, and irrefutable questions we are putting forward before your arrogant face.

If Lokman Effendi, and Luton scholars have the audacity to deny the teachings of Hazret Ibn Arabi (q.s) for their so called maturidi beliefs, then I will catch and hold of you to the point, where you will deny your own Shaykhs, the Messenger and the LORD of Heavens.

Because you are the leaders of so called Islam of ignorance. You are the leaders of second jaahiliyah, in which leaders will be worst of the people (Hadith).

We will bring an end to your arrogance, and termiate your beliefs and theology, as it is written, Allah will perish all religions, except Islam (Sunan Abu Dawud). It is imminent that Sunni, Shia,Sufi, Salafi all that external ways must perish. We have enough power and authority given from the heavens to bring down these sects and cults.

Mawlana Shaykh Nazim Al-Haqqani (q.s) declares our Naqshbandi-Rabbani Way, saying: “I am no more a Sufi, be Rabbani”.

No more Sufi sects or other sects, the Rabbani Way is at work.

It is impossible to follow Sunni leaders and external Islamic knowledge while following the teachings of Mawlana Shaykh Nazim (q.s), Hazret Ibn Arabi (q.s), Hazret al Farmadi (q.s), even Hazret Nabi Muhammad alaihiswalathu wa salam.

To be continued, Insha Allah…

Grandshaykh redefines the believer and shocks external scholars!

Sultanul Awliya Shaykh Abdullah Faiz Dagestani (q.s) redefines a believer and unbeliever:

The 39th Grandshaykh of the Naqshabandi-Haqqani (Osmanli Naksibendi Way) teach us the meaning of believer and unbeliever according to Tasawwuf (Sufism).

In a shocking blow on literalists and mauturidi theologians, Grandshaykh declares that everyone who say: “Allah, God, Bhagavan/Adonai, Hallelujah” in their own language or tradition should be considered as a “believer”.

We would like to know, what’s the fatwa of British Sunni Imams against Shaykh Abdullah Dagestani (q.s) for making such a anti-sunni anti-maturidi heretical claim?

Mr Lokman Effendi, its time to book another flight to the U.K to come hug and lick the boots of external sunni scholars of U.K and elsewhere.

Lets wait and see for the Luton Imams to organise a meeting and to summon their demon Mr Lokman Effendi and demand Lokman to reject the teachings of Hazret Shaykh Abdullah Dagestani (q.s), just as they had done against the teachings of Hazret ibn Arabi (q.s) and other early Saints.

In the Book Mercy Oceans, we read in OPage 157-158

Who is an unbeliever?

Our Grandsheikh says whoever is never saying «Allah» is a kâfir, unbeliever. Anyone saying «Allah», even in his own language, you must not say to him «Kafir». This is clear, our Grandsheikh is leaving this so wide, so open, not making conditions, all Prophets just came to make people, believing in their Lord, not in themselves. Anyone saying «God» must be considered a believer. Even if a person says, as we do in English, «Oh my God», Allah is catching him. This is gigantic good news. The Prophet, peace be upon him, says if a person says: «Ya Rabb», Allah says to him: «I am here, oh my servant, what do you need?» Allah is closer to you than you to yourself.

Reference: Mercy Oceans, Page 157-158

Mercy Oceans download

These teachings goes against the narratives in Fiqh and Aqeedha (Jurisprudence and Theology) of traditional sunni and salafi Islam.

According to Quran, only those who believed in the Prophet Muhammad (a.s) is considered as believers.

Quran 2:4 and who believe in what has been revealed to you ˹O Prophet˺1 and what was revealed before you, and have sure faith in the Hereafter.

According to Quran and Hadiths, Prayer and Zakat together constitutes the definition of a believer:

Narrated Abdullah bin Buraidah narrated from his father:

that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: “The covenant between us and them is the Salat, so whoever abandons it he has committed disbelief.” Tirmidhi 2621 (sahih)

During the Caliphate of Hazret Abu Bakkar (ra), he wage war against those Muslims who refused to pay Zakat.

According to standard Sunni theology, one has to believe in five pillars of Islam and six pillars of Iman (faith) to be considered a believer. (Quran 2:285, Hadith2/40 hadith Nawawi).

This means, Jews, Christians, Hindus and even other people should be considered as believers. Especially we notice that external scholars like Zakir Naik, Ahmad Deedat (Sunni) and other quotes Hindu scriptures and explains that Prophet (a.s) is mentioned in the Hindu scriptures as the Kalki or final incarnation of the Lord Vishnu.

So many Hindus have converyed to Islam, realising that Prophet Muhammad (a.s) is the incarnation of their God, Lord Vishnu.

Our question to Zakir Naik and others is that: if a person come to Islam based on the description given in the books of their former religion, will their faith be considered authentic accoridng to Islamic aqeedha?.

Summary:

Sufism (Islamic spirituality( is the universal religion of the Prophets and Saints, it is never excluding others from the previous scriptures and covenants. But the way of Shariah and Aqeedha (Islamic law and theology) excludes people of different scriptures and backgrounds. Although some verses in the Quran and Hadiths uphold universality of religious way.

Sunni theological dogma related to the teachings of Sufi Saints

Bismillahi Rahmani Raheem

Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon the Prophet Muhammad, his family and companions.

In this article I have been inspired to highlight a few points to the adherents of Sunni theology (Ashari/Mathuridi , etc .) and deviant theology such as Salafism.

Modern Sunni scholars and external Sufi sect leaders such as Lokman Effendi who set aside the Sufi beliefs (beliefs of his own Shaykhs) and run to please these external (Diploma based) Sunni scholars, who often identify themselves as Sufi as well as Sunni (ashari/mathuridhi), are fallible in their beliefs and attachments to a particular theological creed.

Some of the statement of great Sufis contradicts Sunni beliefs (Ashari/Mathurdi and others).

These are a few example highlighted below, the Sunni scholars to some extent follows the Sufi Shaykhs and Sufi Paths, while they are unable to stick to their school of theology in full conviction.

Internal Sufi leaders (spritual leaders) and external sufi leaders (leaders of a sufi group or community)

Internal Sufi leaders will not bow down to the views of external scholars as their views differs in various schools, and their intellectual faith, they are bound to the spiritual authority and spiritual wisdom. Not wisdom based on thinking and studying books of the spiritually blind (external scholars).

External Sufi leaders are set to follow both the internal Sufi leaders and external scholars. They have to balanace between the two forces. The Spiritual realities and the intellectul approaches to mysticism and external teachings of the religion.

These matters are to be explained in much detail, but this article is a brief introduction to provoke false/external Sufi leaders who rebel against Awliya Allah and to external scholars, who are filled with hypocrisy.

The Sufi Beliefs and acts that are considered heresy in Sunni theology:

1- Al Hallaj saying: “Anal Haqq” I am the truth:

Fariduddin Attar says: “I am surprised at people who see the sound of ‘Ana Allah’ that was coming from a tree at Mount Sinai as legitimate but the same voice when uttered through the tongue of Hallaj is labelled violation of Sharia.

According to Sunni Islam, Allah would not speak through any human or creations. Allah only sends revelations to Angel Jibirl (a.s), and revelations has ended with the Prophet Muhammad alaihiswalathu wa salam.

According to a Hadith, some chosen people would see dreams and visions, there are no other parts of Prophethood remains in the world. At the same time, 40 Hadith Nawawi 38, narrates from Sahih Al Bukhari: Allah would speak and act through His Servant (friend/Wali).

But the scholars who executed Al-Hallaj, didn’t consider the wisdom behind Allah speaking at the the tree on Mount Sinai, the spiritual states and utterence of Christ, his wisdom and words (i.e. I am the way and the Truth) while passing judgement on Al-Hallaj.

This is because the religion of the external scholars or Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jamah doesn’t stand up to defend the truth. It works as an insitututional religious group to preach only a standard intellecutal theology to the common public Muslims.

But the hysterical fact is that, the same scholars who murdered Al Hallaja, hates the Jews who passed judgement to murder Hazret Isa Al Masih (Jesus the Messiah). They even quote verses from the Quran and other narration, and explains God’s curse on the Jews for they murdered Prophets and persecuted Jesus son of Mary (Peace be upon them). But according to the grand muftis of the Jews in Al-Aqsa (Baytul Maqdis), Isa bin Maryam was a heretic like Al Hallaj and ibn Arabi.

God curses the Jews for attempted murder of Isa (a.s), and God spares the murderers of Al-Hallaja?, God of double-standards?. Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jamah’s (Islam of intellectuals) Ijma and Qiyas terribly fails to see the spriitual states of Prophets and heirs of the Prophets.

So we can see that decision of Jewish scholars to execute Jesus Christ (a.s) is same as the decision of the latter Ahlu Sunnah scholars to execute Al Hallaja and Ibn Arabi. Your creed stands next to the Jewish leaders who are cursed by Allah and Messiah!

And today, Jahil (ignorant) Sufi Shaykhs in America (no need to name them, you know them by their fruits and actions) and Europe falling at the feet of the successors/impostors of these external scholars (partly sufi scholars and non-sufi scholars) for the wahabi type Islamic spirituality.

2- Al Bistami’s statements:

 And he said, “O My Lord, Your obedience to me is greater than my obedience to You.”

Adh-Dhahabi quoted him in many great matters, among which were “Praise to Me, for My greatest Glory!” and “There is nothing in this robe I am wearing except Allah.”

Quoted by external Sufi leader Shaykh Hisham Kabbani

https://naqshbandi.org/the-naqshbandi-golden-chain/the-chain/tayfur-abu-yazid-al-bistami

While they disown Ib Al Arabi, they have to accept Al Bistami in their Silsila as a grand Shaykh! Shameful Sufi heretics of today!

3- The Naqshabandi Sufi Master, Abu Ali Al Farmadi (q.s) states:

I heard that Abul Hasan al-Farmadhi said, ‘the Ninety-nine Attributes of Allah will become attributes and descriptions of the seeker in the way of Allah.

https://naqshbandi.org/the-naqshbandi-golden-chain/the-chain/abu-ali-al-farmadi

External Sufi sect leader Shaykh Hisham Kabbani quotes this in his book: “Naqshbandi Way: History and Guidebook of the Saints of the Golden Chain.

Most of the Ashari-Mathurdhi people follow Naqshbandi Order, What does Ashari and Mathuridi schools say about this claim?

Second Naqshbandi heretic Sufi next to Hazret Bistami and non-Naqshbandi Ibn Arabi? I ask the so called Mathuridi Naqshbandi scholars of this time!

How could you hail them and not hail Ib Arabi (q.s)?

4- Qadri Sufi master, Ghause Al Azam Shaykh Abdul Qadir Jilani (q.s) claimed to save Al Hallaj from execution.

The Shariah of those who gave verdict to exectute Al Hallaj and the Shariah of Ghause Al Azam who would save Al-Hallaj differs.t Because one is the Shariah of human thinking and the Shariah of Ghause Al Azam is the Shariah of Divine inspiration.

The Shariah verdict without Tasawwuf:

Imam Malik (94-179 H./716-795 CE)

Imam Malik (r) said, “Whoever studies jurisprudence (fiqh) and didn’t study Sufism (tasawwuf) will be corrupted; and whoever studied tasawwuf and didn’t study jurisprudence will become a heretic; and whoever combined both will be reach the Truth.” This saying is mentioned and explained in the book of the scholar ‘Ali al-Adawi with the explanation of Imam Abil-Hassan, a scholar of jurisprudence, vol. 2, p. 195. (quoted by Hisham Kabbani in his Book).

As I explained earlier, Ghause al Azam and Jouhar Ali Naqshabandi Will not bow down to the understanding of Shariah based on the intellect (mind/ego). The Law Must be understood together with the Tasawwuf, you cannot understand the Law and Tasawwuf without understanding Hazret Muhammad (a.s) , Hazret Isa (a.s) and Hazret Musa (a.s)

It would be possible that the decapitated head of Hazret Yahya (a.s) and the head of Hazret Imam Hussain (a.s) can be brought in a platter. Sunni scholars would do the same things today as their predecessors did such things to Al-Hallaja and hazret Ibn Arabi. And the precedessors of those scholars who murdered Ibn Arabi and Hallaja , did those things to Hazret Zachariah (a.s), Hazret Yahya (a.s) and Hazret Isa (a.s).

Hazret Ghause Al Azam also performed a miracle before a Christian, resurrecting a dead in the name of Nabi Muhamamd (a.s).

According to Shariah and Aqeedha (in the Quran and in the Torah), it is idolatry to invoke the name of creation in exchange of the name of the Creator.

Riyad As-Saliheen 1711. Ibn ‘Umar (May Allah be pleased with them) said: I heard a man saying: “No, by the Ka’bah.” I admonished him: “Do not swear by any thing besides Allah, for I heard the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) saying, ‘He who swears by anyone or anything other than Allah, has indeed committed an act of Kufr or Shirk’.”

[At- Tirmidhi]. Also see Deuteronomy 10:20

You Mathuridis and holy Lokman Efendi should disown Ghause Al Azam as well, I dare you to cross check and make a statement of deviation from Shariah and Aqeedha on Ghause Al Azam, Al Bistami and Al Farmadi, based on the egoistic-intellectual-diploma microscope of your so called new version of Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jamah!

If this is ok, then why the Quran condemn Christians praying and taking oath in the name fo Jesus Christ?

I ask Mathuridis and others, Is Nabi (a.s) Allah Himself in human form?, else Ghause Al Azam committed shirk and showed miracle of resurrecting the dead upon Shirk or act of shirk!?

5- Even Hazret Abu Hurairah could not escape the sword of external scholarship and leadership!

Narrated Abu Huraira: I have memorized two kinds of knowledge from Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) . I have propagated one of them to you and if I propagated the second, then my pharynx (throat) would be cut (i.e. killed). Sahih Al Bukhari-120

So we can understand the Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jamah only propagate half of the Prophetic knowledge (external knowledge and some theology based on the inetellectual efforts of external scholars). The other half (part) is ether lost or preserved. The way of the Prophet is either complete and eevryone can walk on its fullness(Quran 2:208) or either it is incomplete or partially lost. Either Islam is preserved as a wholesome knoweldge (prophets leave wisdom, not dinar and dirham-Hadith), or lost its half.

Certainly the truth is in what is hidden, the world is against the truth, only a chosen ones’ knows and only the true followers of the chosen ones will recognise this hidden wisdom.

Allah Almighty guarantees the preservantion of the fulness of the religion. But certainly its not preserved with none of the religous sects, including those who claim to be ahlu sunnah wal jamah, yet have been opponents of hazret ibn Arabi and other saints.

Christians prays in the Name of Jesus Christ, and the best of Muslims Shaykh Abdul Qadir Al Jilani (Ghause E Pak/ Ghuase Al Azam) prayed in the name of Nabi Muhammad (a.s)

We also see the same Sunni scholars and external Sufis call upon the martyrs of Badr (Ya Shuhadaul Badr Adriknee/madad) , seeking madad from Prophet (a.s), Hazret Ali (a.s)., hazret Hassan (a.s), hazret Hussain(a.s). Ghause Al Azam (q.s) and others.

Based on your Ashari/Mathuridi Aqeedha , is it permissible?, is it valid according to the Quran?

Salafis quote Quran and judge you in the same way as you quote Shariaha and judged Al Hallaja, Ibn Arabi and others.

Lets mention these verses and the hadiths, and lets sit and have a grand discussion, come over LoL

The Sunni Sufi claim that the Prophets and Shaykhs knows everything happening in this world and among their followers, which goes against this verse and Hadith:

Quran 5:116 And (remember) when Allah will say (on the Day of Resurrection): “O ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary)! Did you say unto men: ‘Worship me and my mother as two gods besides Allah?’ ” He will say: “Glory be to You! It was not for me to say what I had no right (to say). Had I said such a thing, You would surely have known it.

As a matter of fact, we know that no Christian worship Mary, but Catholic and Orthodox denominations honour Mary and ask for her intercession (Isthighasa/Shafa’a).

Quran 5:117 I said not to them except what You commanded me – to worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord. And I was a witness over them as long as I was among them; but when You took me up, You were the Observer over them, and You are, over all things, Witness.

Quran 9 :31 They have taken their scholars and monks as lords besides Allah, and [also] the Messiah, the son of Mary. And they were not commanded except to worship one God; there is no deity except Him. Exalted is He above whatever they associate with Him.

Sahih Al Bukhari 6582 Narrated Anas: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, “Some of my companions will come to me at my Lake Fount, and after I recognize them, they will then be taken away from me, whereupon I will say, ‘My companions!’ Then it will be said, ‘You do not know what they innovated (new things) in the religion after you.”

According to Sunni/Salafi beliefs, no one can be greater than the Prophets. So if the Prophets do not know the state of their followers, how come your ya Ali Madad, Ya Gahuse Madad , Labbaika ya Rasool Allah works?

Imam Mahdi (a.s) will call upon Hazret Isa (a.s), and He listen to them, a deobandi external Sunni scholar claims:

Hadhrat Isa’s (A.S.) Descension and The Physical Features of Hadhrat Isa (A.S.)

He will resemble the famous Sahabi (A.S.) Hadhrat Urwa bin Masoodi (R.A.). He will be of average height and red and white in colour. His hair spread to the shoulders, straight, neat and shining as after a bath. On bending his head, it will seem as if pearls are falling. He will have an armour on his body. He will be wearing two pieces of cloth light yellow in color.

His Descension
He will descend on a Jamaat (group) that will be righteous at the time and comprising of 800 men and 400 women. The people will be preparing for war at the time against Dajjal (the anti-Christ). It will be time for Fajr prayers, and Imam Mahdi will be the Amir (leader). From the darkness of the dawn, a sound will suddenly be heard that “one who listens to your pleas has come” — the righteous people will look everywhere and their eyes will fall on Isa (A.S.).

reference: http://www.beautifulislam.net/signs/signs_qiyamah_e_p.html

Are these Quran and Hadith verses are false?. When the Quran says, only Allah is the witness after Hazret isa was taken up by Allah, and the Hadith says even the Prophet (a.s) do not know what some companions have done after him. What’s your intellect (mind) now race about these strong evidences?

How do you all Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jamah and all the external Sufis reconcile your intellectual ideologies and theology with these verses in the Quran and Hadiths?

Lets have some serious discussion. I welcome you forward in accordance with. Sura Fatiha “iyyaka na’budu wa iyyaka nastha’een”

Verdict: Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jamah or any other Islamic denominations are not propagating the full truth and wisdom of religion. True wisdom and true religion is with the Awliya Allah, and those who respect them and acknowledge their superiority, they are the saved people. Those who dishonour the Saints (Awliya Allah) cannot be true Saints or true Scholars or saved group. Those who attack the saints, deny their wisdom, calling them heretics or teach that these saints teachings goes against the Ahlu Sunnah Wal jamah, and make your intellectual ahlu sunnah wal jamah masquarade as a saved group, all these are liars and deceivers. You are exposed and reminded of your ignorance and hypocrisy!

The U.K Sunni Imams Dilemma and Lokman Effendi’s Commitment to Shaykh Abdul Kerim (Q.S)

Leader of the Luton Sunni-Sufi group partake in Shia gathering-Halaqa. Lokman went to hug this Sunni Imam and seeking validation for Lokman’s evil cult activities in the U.K

Finally I ask the so called Jahil Mathuridis of England and the so called his holiness Lokman Effendi, Under which aqeedha of Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jamah and teachings of Abdul Kerim Al-Kibirisi , this participation and hugging of Shia?. This scholars claims to be Naqshbandi Mujaddidi, he went to hug Shia people who insult Abu Bakkar (r.a) and Umar (r.a), and hazret Ayesha (r.a).

Shaykh Abdul Kerim mock and disowns so called inheritor Lokman Effendi in advance:

Stop giving lecture wherever you are Mr Lokman Effendi

Shaykh Abdul Kerim disowns those who hug Wahabis and Shia! Lokman Hoja hugs those who hug Shia!

Lokman and Professor and Imam of Al Hira Masjid Luton, Masood Aktar Hazarvi

BismillahI Rahmani Raheem 

Q&A Answer with Shaykh Abdul Kerim Al-Kibrisi (q.s)

Lokman Mixing with hypociritcal Imams for validation. the spirit of Shaykh Abdul Kerim would disown Lokman, who falsely claim to be his inheritor and goes to hug and validate Osmanli Naksibendi way from Masood Aktar who hug and lead shia majlis!

Watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeF9btyeCtw

Lokman Hoja who became a tyrant was destined to meet Prof Masood Hazarvi. There is a history of Masood and Lokman being tyrant to Jouhar Ali Naqshabandi Al-Hassani. This incident spans between 2010-2012 when Jouhar Ali Naqshabandi arrived in Luton, and Lokman’s envy against Jouhar Ali Naqshabandi creating rifts and fitnah in 2011-2012 period.

Lokman needed validation from Masood Aktar, who said to Jouhar Ali Naqshabandi in 2010: “Sleeping in Masjid is Haram”, when Jouhar Ali Naqshabandi approached Masood Aktar and other Luton Dawate Islami, Sunni, Naqshbandi Aslami’s for a temperory shelter in the Mosque or their Khanaqa, due to adverse situation faced by Jouhar Ali Naqshbandi and spouse from so called Luton Tijani leader and others. Finally, the U.K government sheltered Jouhar Ali Naqshabandi and spouse, and overlooked their British law to give accommodation for non-U.K citizen, while Mosque Laws and so called peity of Luton Imams and Muslim community leader failed to support us when we were in dire needs.

Shaykh Abdul Kerim Al-Kibrisi (q.s) knew this situations, in fact, he didn’t like how this Luton Imams and Mosque people treated us, when we were seeking some kindness in the harsh winter of January 2010. But another Muslim who operate a pub restaurant came up to help and support us. God taught us practical lessons in religion and spirituality as HE ALMIGHTY taught the Prophets through the mistreatment these prophets and their family had experienced from the hypocrites and disbelievers in their times.

The Imam could have said: Mosque committee doesn’t allow to sleep in the Mosque, but saying that “sleeping in the mosque is haram”, now you are making a lie about Allah and His Messenger (a.s), that it is forbidden in the Law of Allah to sleep in the mosque.

Tyrants like Lokman, Masood and other Naqshbandi Khalifas appoint Adnan Hoja (Harun Yahya) as Qutub and sultan of Saints, to validate  Lokman Hoja , and other Hojas , people like Mehmet Adil would tirelessly follow Harun Yahya, who is declared as a worst criminal by the court in Trukey!

These liars and tyrants, meet ups and run extra miles to validate each other, praise and support, aid and defend each other, claiming to be the defenders of truth. 

Mehmet Adil leader of false Naqshbandi Haqqanis endorse Harun Yahya as a deputy of Allah!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rcSemSt51o

Adnan Kabbani claims  Harun Yahya is Qutub and just mentioning his  name is a blessings: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4XU7SIQpgM

Divinely oceans crap!, if these Sufi dressed liars and deceivers  are not the camp of Antichrist, then who else befit to be called the camp of anitchrist from the Sunni-Sufi world?

  • A Turkish cult leader has been handed an 8,658-year jail sentence. What crimes did he commit?

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/a-turkish-cult-leader-has-been-handed-an-8-658-year-jail-sentence-what-crimes-did-he-commit/73bejmkqp

I thank Allah Almighty for saving me from this falsehood and guidinbg me to the spiritual fellowship of Hazret Isa bin Maryam (A.S).

I bid farewell to all false Sunni sects and tyrant Sufi leaders like Lokman, Masood and others. Lakum Deenukum Waliya Deen–

Falsehood of Lokman Hoja-the so called defender of truth, and the so called Mathuridis and friends of Shiaism continues. Who is the friend of the friend (Luton Imam) of the enemies (Shia) of the friends (Abu Bakkar and Umar) of your Prophet in this pic?. LoL Now get lost all you false Sufis and false Mathuridis. Shame on Luton imams council and other so called Scholars of Sunni groups in the UK.

You people have no sincerity, honesy, integrity, and commitment to your own beliefs, leaders, groups or association. So don’t push your cult Sufi / intellectual Ahlu Sunnah Islam and beliefs on me. Its a reminder to discipline you and put in back in your corners. Know your boundaries, don’t cross the line, that’s good for you and good for your blind and arrogant followers.

These are the words of Ali and you can never prevail over them, not in this world and in the world to come!

wa salamun alal mursaleen

walhamdulillahi Rabbil Aalameen

Jouhar Ali Naqshabandi Al-Hassani*
(current representative of the Naqshabandi-Rabbani Way)